That’s because Iowa is one of four states that bans sales of any fireworks other than sparklers and a few novelty items. Four states ban everything. And 42 states and the District of Columbia have laws that allow some form of consumer fireworks sales and firing them off.
Proposed legislation in the Iowa Senate would change that. And we haven’t seen evidence that some limited change would significantly increase fires or fireworks injuries in our state.
Even though it’s not legal for Iowans to shoot off fireworks such as roman candles and skyrockets, lots of us do anyway after buying them out of state. Unless neighbors file complaints or a safety hazard is reported, authorities generally are reluctant to bring charges.
The bill’s supporters are interested mostly in keeping the economic benefits and sales tax revenue within our borders. And that makes some sense, although the amount would be modest.
The proposal limits sales to those 18 and older. Local governments, such as cities and counties, would retain the ability to ban sales within their jurisdictions if they are seen as a public safety threat. The state fire marshal also could issue restrictions. Drought conditions that elevate the risk of grass fires, for example, come to mind.
Even with the “safer,” more regulated fireworks of today, injuries still happen — the majority are burns to hands, fingers and head, mostly because of users not being careful. Over the past five years, the nation’s emergency rooms treated about 6,000 to 9,000 such injuries per year. Deaths are rare. And on Independence Day, not surprisingly, about 40 percent of the nation’s reported fires are attributed to fireworks misuse, according to the National Fire Protection Association.
The dangers of misusing fireworks should not be diminished. Yet Iowans already are shooting them off. If they could buy them closer to home, would the injury and fire counts increase substantially? Doubtful.
Without some kind of national restriction on sales of consumer fireworks, a continued ban in Iowa seems hard to support. And do Iowans really need such “protection” from the state, especially from their own careless mistakes?
-
Recent Posts
- Pyro Shipping Crisis
- Confusion over importance of Tube Diameter in Fireworks Hazard Rating 对管径在定义烟花爆竹危险级别中重要性的困惑
- Complex situation unfolding in real-time,how fireworks regulations difference in US and China affects the products classification
- The Dunpai fireworks team have a great summer breaks
- Dunpai fireworks in action to overcome difficulties
Recent Comments
- Sharie Mantelli on China, Japan, Meltdown, Tsunami & The Fireworks Industry
- view on Fireworks In New York City, March 15th, 2011
- San Juan del Sur on China, Japan, Meltdown, Tsunami & The Fireworks Industry
Archives
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- June 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
Categories
- 2019
- 2020
- Accidents
- cake fireworks
- China
- color smoke fireworks
- Firecrackers
- fireworks
- fireworks Assortment
- fireworks container
- fireworks culture
- Fireworks display
- Fireworks display shells
- Fireworks factory
- Fireworks history
- Fireworks Industy Update
- fireworks loading container
- Fireworks news
- fireworks reloadable Artillery
- fireworks rules
- fireworks show photo
- Fountain fireworks
- New Years
- parachute cake fireworks
- Roman Candle Fireworks
- Spotlight On!
- star fireworks
- Uncategorized
- Video
- World Fireworks Events
- 烟花爆竹的消防安全
- 花炮发展史
- 花炮新闻
